专升本英语

The government is spending()on railways.A、millions of dollarsB、million of dollarsC、millions of dollarD、million dollars

题目

The government is spending()on railways.

  • A、millions of dollars
  • B、million of dollars
  • C、millions of dollar
  • D、million dollars
如果没有搜索结果,请直接 联系老师 获取答案。
如果没有搜索结果,请直接 联系老师 获取答案。
相似问题和答案

第1题:

听力原文: Now European finance ministers are expected to reprimand the Irish government today after they meet in Brussels. They've been alarmed by December's budget in the Irish Republic which cut taxes and increased government spending. The other European countries fear this will stoke up inflation and undermine the stability of the Euro, the single currency.

Finance ministers from the European Unions 15 states are holding their regular monthly meeting in Brussels. They've been given the tricky task of handing out some public criticism to the government of the country with the most successful economy, the Irish Republic. In the last five years Ireland has boomed growing by an average eight percent a year, unemployment has reached its lowest level for 20 years and commodity prices in Dublin became more expensive than in London.

Why do other European countries criticize Ireland?

A.They worry that the Irish Republic's budget plan will undermine the stability of European Unions.

B.EU countries fear that Irish Republic's finance plan will cause inflation.

C.Other countries will have to cut taxes.

D.Other EU countries must increase government spending, too.


正确答案:B

第2题:

[A] spending

[B] planning

[C] financing

[D] saving


正确答案:A
31.A【精析】spending开支;plamung规划过程;financing融资;saving 节省。此处表示的是两种电站的运转都需要大的花销,故选A。

第3题:

It is believed that () spending will certainly lead to the bankrupt.

A、natural

B、mysterious

C、moist

D、excessive


参考答案:D

第4题:

Text 4 When the government talks about infrastructure contributing to the economy the focus is usually on roads,railways,broadband and energy.Housing is seldom mentioned.Why is that?To some extent the housing sector must shoulder the blame.We have not been good at communicating the real value that housing can contribute to economic growth.Then there is the scale of the typical housing project.It is hard to shove for attention among multibillionpound infrastructure project,so it is inevitable that the attention is focused elsewhere.But perhaps the most significant reason is that the issue has always been so politically charged.Nevertheless,the affordable housing situation is desperate.Waiting lists increase all the time and we are simply not building enough new homes.The comprehensive spending review offers an opportunity for the government to help rectify this.It needs to put historical prejudices to one side and take some steps to address our urgent housing need.There are some indications that it is preparing to do just that.The communities minister,Don Foster,has hinted that George Osborne,Chancellor of the Exchequer,may introduce more flexibility to the current cap on the amount that local authorities can borrow against their housing stock debt.Evidence shows that 60,000 extra new homes could be built over the next five years if the cap were lifted,increasing GDP by 0.6%.Ministers should also look at creating greater certainty in the rental environment,which would have a significant impact on the ability of registered providers to fund new developments from revenues.But it is not just down to the government.While these measures would be welcome in the short term,we must face up to the fact that the existing£4.5bn programme of grants to fund new affordable housing,set to expire in 2015,is unlikely to be extended beyond then.The Labour party has recently announced that it will retain a large part of the coalition's spending plans if returns to power.The housing sector needs to accept that we are very unlikely to ever return to era of largescale public grants.We need to adjust to this changing climate.While the government’s commitment to long-term funding may have changed,the very pressing need for more affordable housing is real and is not going away.
It can be learned that affordable housing has______

A.increased its home supply
B.offered spending opportunities
C.suffered government biases
D.disappointed the government

答案:C
解析:
推理题【命题思路】这是一道封闭式推理题。考生需要在对第三段和第四段的信息理解的基础之上进行推理。【直击答案】根据题干可以定位到第三段第一句话,经济适用房的情况不容乐观。第四段接着提到政府的综合支出审查是改善这一情况的一次机会,但政府需要将历史偏见先放到一边。这说明经济适用房曾遇到过偏见,这正是C项所表达的含义。从同义替换的角度来看,“suffered”是过去式,是对于原文“historical”的同义替换,“biases”是对原文“prejudices”的同义替换。【干扰排除】A项与原文信息相反,第三段第二句指出对经济适用房的需求量一直增加(waiting lists increase),而非供应量(supply)增加。第四段说综合支出审查给改善经济适用房的情况提供了机会,而B项是指经济适用房给政府支出提供了机会,这属于信息混淆,故排除。D项“经济适用房让政府很失望”在文中并未提及,属于无中生有,故排除。

第5题:

17.

A.spent

B.spend

C.spends

D.spending


正确答案:A

第6题:

Because, according to Keynes, inadequate total demand increases unemployment, the indicated cure is either more investment by businesses or more spending and consequently larger budget deficits by government.


正确答案:

译文:因为,按照凯恩斯的理论,不充分的总体需求会增加失业,建议的解决方式是企业扩大投资或政府增加开支,继而增加预算赤字。

 

本题考核的知识点是:词性转换。

该句是包含原因状语从句的复合句,句子主干是the indicated cure is,表语由并列连词either or…连接。

词汇方面:indicated是过去分词用做形容词,动词indicate意为“表明,暗示,提及,建议”,根据上下文indicated译为“建议的”。more investmentmore spendinglarger budget deficits是形容词比较级加名词,根据汉语习惯转换成动词加名词的搭配,即“扩大投资”、“增加开支”和“增加预算赤字”。

第7题:

电子政务的主要应用模式中不包括( )。

A.政府对政府(Government To Government) B.政府对客户(Government To Customer) C.政府对公务员(Government To Employee) D.政府对企业(Government To Business)


正确答案:B

第8题:

() describes the way in which government purchases goods and services through electronic media such as Internet.

A、autioner

B、government to business

C、broadcaster

D、banner ads


正确答案:B

第9题:

If you really understood the difficulties facing the government,you wouldn’t be so critical( )its spending reductions.
of


答案:
解析:
be critical of…“对……挑剔,对……吹毛求疵”。句意:如果你真正了解政府所面临的困境,你就不会对其削减开支那么吹毛求疵了。

第10题:

Text 4 When the government talks about infrastructure contributing to the economy the focus is usually on roads,railways,broadband and energy.Housing is seldom mentioned.Why is that?To some extent the housing sector must shoulder the blame.We have not been good at communicating the real value that housing can contribute to economic growth.Then there is the scale of the typical housing project.It is hard to shove for attention among multibillionpound infrastructure project,so it is inevitable that the attention is focused elsewhere.But perhaps the most significant reason is that the issue has always been so politically charged.Nevertheless,the affordable housing situation is desperate.Waiting lists increase all the time and we are simply not building enough new homes.The comprehensive spending review offers an opportunity for the government to help rectify this.It needs to put historical prejudices to one side and take some steps to address our urgent housing need.There are some indications that it is preparing to do just that.The communities minister,Don Foster,has hinted that George Osborne,Chancellor of the Exchequer,may introduce more flexibility to the current cap on the amount that local authorities can borrow against their housing stock debt.Evidence shows that 60,000 extra new homes could be built over the next five years if the cap were lifted,increasing GDP by 0.6%.Ministers should also look at creating greater certainty in the rental environment,which would have a significant impact on the ability of registered providers to fund new developments from revenues.But it is not just down to the government.While these measures would be welcome in the short term,we must face up to the fact that the existing£4.5bn programme of grants to fund new affordable housing,set to expire in 2015,is unlikely to be extended beyond then.The Labour party has recently announced that it will retain a large part of the coalition's spending plans if returns to power.The housing sector needs to accept that we are very unlikely to ever return to era of largescale public grants.We need to adjust to this changing climate.While the government’s commitment to long-term funding may have changed,the very pressing need for more affordable housing is real and is not going away.
The author believes that after 2015,the government may____

A.implement more policies to support housing
B.review the need for largescale public grants
C.renew the affordable housing grants programme
D.stop generous funding to the housing sector

答案:D
解析:
推理题【命题思路】这是一道开放式推理题。考生需要将最后一段的主要内容和文章的主旨相结合进行推理。【直击答案】根据题干可以回文定位到最后一段。第二句提到用于建设经济适用房项目的资金将于2015年到期,而且不可能延期。这就意味着政府的投资停止了。D项与原文信息相符。【干扰排除】文中主要提到的是住房建设所遇到的资金问题,并没有提及政策性问题,因而A项属于无中生有,故排除。最后一段第四句话提到我们不可能再回到大规模的公共设施投资时代,因此政府未来将不会再重新审视大规模的公共设施投资需求,故B项与原文意思不符。同理,政府也不会更新经济适用房建设计划,故排除C项。

更多相关问题