They should be used only when direct selling is not economically feasible.
They can be used to exclude from the program audience people who are not part of the program target.
They are used only for very expensive products.
They are rarely used in the implementation of marketing programs for industrial products.
第1题:
Which of the following is NOT mentioned about the swarm of bees in the passage?
A. They crowded like a black cloud.
B. They shocked and terrified Andy.
C. They tried to attack Andy in a mass.
D. They made Andy stay in hospital for two days.
第2题:
A、Disclosure of private feeling is distasteful.
B、People are suspicious of outsiders.
C、Uniformity is not highly thought of.
D、there is a positive attitude about words of disagreement.
第3题:
Which of the following is NOT TRUE according to the passage?
A.The zoo needed more information about the woman.
B.A baby elephant was hurt during the war.
C.The woman lived quite near the zoo.
第4题:
It is used in the marketing of most industrial products.
It is often used in cases where there is a large program target.
It is not economically feasible for most marketing programs.
It is used only for products for which there are many potential customers.
第5题:
第6题:
According to the passage, which of the following about the borrower's financial weakness is false?
A.Past record of repayment.
B.Low profitability.
C.Poor management.
D.Heavy obligations to creditors.
第7题:
Which of the following credit is not mentioned in the passage?
A.irrevocable
B.revocable
C.standby
D.confirmed
第8题:
Which of the following is TRUE according to the passage?
A. Chinese students won most of the awards.
B. Not all the themes were about local subjects
C. The blogs could be written in Chinese or Singlish.
D. The judges were from university in Singapore and China.
第9题:
第10题:
The author of Passage 1 lauds the benefits science has produced, while the author of Passage 2 speaks hopefully of possible future benefits.
Both of the passages react with distrust to the idea of using science to assess chimpanzees.
The first passage lists the studies that showed positive chimp interactions, while the author of Passage 2 refutes their claims,
The first passage suggests that science can have a positive impact on perceptions about chimps, whereas the second passage views science as almost universally negative.
The author of the first passage is more apt to justify using chimps in science than the author of Passage 2.